One of the first UAV solutions with sense and avoid system on the market, it is expected to save customers thousands in costs.

“This will change the way we inspect telecommunication towers, utility poles, oil rigs and even chimney stacks forever,” explained Jan Wouter Kruyt, Head of Research and Development at Aerialtronics.

“The Zenith can be flown at an adjustable safe distance with a minimum of 6.5 ft. from the object while recording or relaying photographs, video or data from the field. This enables even inexperienced users to safely fly a camera next to a utility pole or chimney.”

The sense and avoid solution can detect obstacles up to 23 ft. away at a 360-degree angle, whether they are static or moving. There are also bounce back and distance keeping functions. Watch it in action:

Kruyt said: “The solution we’ve developed is distance sensing and distance keeping. Our drones can be programmed to ‘stop moving forward’ or ‘bounce back’ when they get within a critical distance from any object, be that a wall, a pole or a flying object. It is particularly important in windy conditions where the drone stability is crucial.

“With sense and avoid, the Zenith UAS can detect if there is a risk of collision and respond accordingly.”

Combined with the flight performance of the Zenith and the flexibility of its payloads range, this smart sense and avoid technology adds another dimension to the Altura Zenith, which enables users to focus on delivering data results instead of flying skills.

Kruyt said: “This sense and avoid solution really adds value to what our customers can buy. The Zenith is a robust and flexible platform. It’s a heavy lifter, it has strong endurance and is very stable under difficult wind conditions. If you add a Zenith branded sense and avoid system to that, it will be indispensable in the inspection market.

“When we go into full production of the sense and avoid technology this year, the Zenith will be ready for using multiple sensors. It’s a powerful and flexible inspection UAS with best performance versus cost in the market.”